How Dangerous is Pulmonary Embolism?

Subscribe to Resus

Get the latest updates on our Conferences PLUS our Webcasts and Education Newsletters. And it's FREE!

  • We respect your privacy
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Register Now:

Sorry, we couldn't find any posts. Please try a different search.

How Dangerous is Pulmonary Embolism?

The diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism(PE), like most things in emergency medicine; it’s about risk stratification. In chest pain, the low risk patient is approached very differently to the high risk, ST elevation chest pain patient. It is exactly the same in PE. There is that group of patients who are sick; they are short of breath and hypoxic and don’t pass the end of the bed test. We know that these patients are sick and need treatment.

Then there is that ambulant well looking group that we apply PERC rules and Wells Scores and D-dimers to. The risk of mortality can’t be the same in these two groups. Sometimes however we may be over-investigating the well group and it may just possible that we are doing more harm than good.

Let’s look at the risk and assessment them appropriately.

Where is the evidence?

The ‘landmark’ PE study, whose figures are most often quoted, appeared in the Lancet in 1960(1). It included 35 patients that were very sick, ie., patients confined to a hospital bed for some 10 days. The death rate from PE in this group was 17%.

This certainly doesn’t describe the majority of patients I see in the ED.

In 1990 in JAMA(2), a study of 931 patients was published, which looked at the value of V/Q scans in acute pulmonary embolism. 30% of the patients in this study were ED patients. The rate of mortality was 5%.

In 1997, Nielsen(3) took 87 patients with a deep venous thrombosis and a known PE. The PE in this group was silent. Patients were randomised to either receive anticoagulation or no anticoagulation. No deaths were recorded.

Kline in 2008(4), whilst developing the PERC rule, enrolled 8138 patients in a prospective study. 47 PE’s were missed, with 1 death, giving a mortality of 0.2%.

In 2010 Pollack(5) looked at 1880 patients in the ED, who had a PE confirmed on CTPA. There was a mix of patient severity here. Mortality occurred in 20 cases of which 3 had anticoagulant given and 3 had fibrinolytic therapy. Total mortality was 1%.

We start to see exactly what we would expect, that unstable patients with PE, don’t do as well as physiologically normal patients in an ambulatory setting, whose risk may be < 1%.

What if we treat with anticoagulation: Is it dangerous?

Can treatment be more dangerous than the disease?

Dahri(6) in a meta-analysis demonstrated a 6 month bleeding risk of 2.8%. Overall, the risk of fatal haemorrhage was 0.5%.

Carrier in 2010(7) conducted a systematic review, looking at bleeding events in those treated for venous thromboembolism. 69 studies were reviewed and included patients with deep venous thrombosis and PE. Patients received anticoagulation for 3 months. They concluded that the rate of fatal bleeding in the first 3 months was 0.2%.

Pollack(5) in 2010 had also found a mortality rate from haemorrhage of 0.2%.

Can the Investigations for PE, be more harmful than the disease?

Contrast induced nephropathy(CIN) is a potential complication of CTPA. Mitchell(8) looked at 633 patients who had CTPA’s in an outpatient setting ie., well patients. CIN developed in 11% of patients, 6 developed renal failure and 4 of those 6 died from it. From this study, mortality from CTPA was 0.7% and renal failure 1%. The risk of acute kidney injury is low if the GFR>45ml/min.

Thus, putting this into context, if we perform 5 CTPA’s per week, over a year, we are causing 2 deaths per year. We don’t see them, as they occur downstream.

Surely this can’t be right! These figures are so high.

What about radiation exposure?

The median dose of exposure form a CTPA is 9,6mSv(9). This is equivalent to approximately 130 chest rays. Newman extrapolated from these figures and calculated that 1 case in 2000 CTPA’s is fatal.

Conclusion

If we risk stratify our patients, we know that the mortality changes. The real mortality of well patients is perhaps < 1% and approaches the lower figure of 0.2%, in physiologically normal, ambulant patients.The CT Pulmonary Angiogram, may have a renal failure risk of 0.7% and radiation risk that may lead to a  mortality of up to 1 patient per 2000 CTPA’s.

If the diagnosis is made in the well group of patients and they are treated, the risk of fatal bleeding at 3 months approaches 0.2%.

If we took 2000 patients, who were ambulant, with normal physiological parameters, the mortality rate of 1% gives 20 deaths.

The mortality from investigating these patients would be, 1 death from malignancy and 14 from renal failure. The mortality from anticoagulant induced bleeding is 4 patients.

Therefore:

  • Mortality when we do nothing = 20 patients
  • Mortality from investigation and management = 19 patients.

Perhaps this is one of those cases where less is more. However, this only applies to low risk patients.

Thus, more work is needed here and a discussion of the treatment of well patients with essentially subsegmental PE’s. In EMCORE 2017, we will be discussing the whole topic of contrast induced nephropathy and if its real or not.

Watch this space, more to come.

References

1 Barritt DW et al. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: A controlled trial. The Lancet vol, 275;7138;18 June 1960.pp.1309-1312.

2 Pioped investigators.  Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). JAMA. 1990 May 23-30;263(20):2753-9.

3 Nielsen Hk et al. Silent pulmonary embolism in patients with deep venous thrombosis. Incidence and fate in a randomized, controlled trial of anticoagulation versus no anticoagulation. J Intern Med. 1994 May;235(5):457-61.

4 Kline JA et al. Prospective multicenter evaluation of the pulmonary embolism rule-out criteria. J Thromb Haemost. 2008 May;6(5):772-80

5 Pollack CV et al.  Clinical characteristics, management, and outcomes of patients diagnosed with acute pulmonary embolism in the emergency department: initial report of EMPEROR (Multicenter Emergency Medicine Pulmonary Embolism in the Real World Registry). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Feb 8;57(6):700-6

6 Dahri K et al. The risk of bleeding with warfarin: a systematic review and performance analysis of clinical prediction rules. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Nov;98(5):980-7.

7 Carrier M et al.  Systematic review: case-fatality rates of recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding events among patients treated for venous thromboembolism. Ann Intern Med. 2010 May 4;152(9):578-89

8 Mitchell AM et al. Incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy after contrast-enhanced computed tomography in the outpatient setting. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010 Jan;5(1):4-9.

9 Smith-Bindman R et al. Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86.

10 Newman D et al Rethinking Testing for Pulmonary Embolism: Less Is More. June 2011Volume 57, Issue 6, Pages 622–627

Dr Peter Kas

Emergency Physician, Educator. Key Interests: Resuscitation, Airway, Emergency Cardiology, Clinical Examination. Creator resus.com.au.

59 Comments

  1. qydsgtidgc on 02/09/2021 at 6:47 am

    How Dangerous is Pulmonary Embolism? – Resus
    qydsgtidgc http://www.gjg4xh44z2jae8ywc44qy0775v147t56s.org/
    [url=http://www.gjg4xh44z2jae8ywc44qy0775v147t56s.org/]uqydsgtidgc[/url]
    aqydsgtidgc

  2. Jonnie on 18/09/2021 at 10:47 am

    What’s up, the whole thing is going well here and
    ofcourse every one is sharing facts, that’s truly fine, keep up writing.

  3. TestoXmen Ingredients on 18/09/2021 at 10:55 am

    Keep functioning ,impressive job!

    My web site: TestoXmen Ingredients

  4. fraserspeirs.com on 18/09/2021 at 10:56 am

    Howdy! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO?
    I’m trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I’m not seeing very good gains.

    If you know of any please share. Kudos!

  5. Tundra Breeze Portable AC Reviews on 18/09/2021 at 11:55 am

    Hi! Do you use Twitter? I’d like to follow you if that would be ok.
    I’m definitely enjoying your blog and look forward to new updates.

    my web page: Tundra Breeze Portable AC Reviews

  6. badbaddog.com on 18/09/2021 at 11:57 am

    I absolutely love your blog and find a lot of your post’s to
    be just what I’m looking for. Would you offer guest writers to write content available for
    you? I wouldn’t mind composing a post or elaborating on most
    of the subjects you write in relation to here.

    Again, awesome website!

    Take a look at my homepage; Erectesto XL Reviews (badbaddog.com)

  7. Mega Male Enhancement Review on 18/09/2021 at 12:25 pm

    Nice read, I just passed this onto a friend who was doing some research on that.
    And he actually bought me lunch since I found it for him smile Therefore let
    me rephrase that: Thank you for lunch!

    Here is my web page; Mega Male Enhancement Review

  8. Max Melt Keto Review on 18/09/2021 at 12:29 pm

    But wanna remark that you have a very decent web site, I the layout
    it actually stands out.

    Here is my website … Max Melt Keto Review

  9. https://proxyusa.org on 18/09/2021 at 12:41 pm

    Can I simply say what a comfort to find somebody who really knows
    what they’re discussing on the web. You definitely realize
    how to bring an issue to light and make it important.

    More and more people ought to read this and understand
    this side of your story. I can’t believe you are not more popular since you certainly
    possess the gift.

  10. Extreme Keto EFX Reviews on 18/09/2021 at 12:43 pm

    Admiring the time and energy you put into your
    website and detailed information you present. It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same unwanted rehashed information. Wonderful read!
    I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m adding your RSS feeds to
    my Google account.

    Here is my blog :: Extreme Keto EFX Reviews

  11. Max Melt Keto Pills on 18/09/2021 at 12:52 pm

    Wow! At last I got a weblog from where I can in fact take useful information regarding my study and knowledge.

    Look at my blog: Max Melt Keto Pills

  12. UltraXTend Wifi Extender on 18/09/2021 at 1:04 pm

    I like this internet site because so much useful material on here :D.

    Stop by my webpage … UltraXTend Wifi Extender

  13. Pure CBD Softgels Reviews on 18/09/2021 at 1:09 pm

    I do not even understand how I finished up here, but I
    thought this publish was great. I do not realize who you might
    be however definitely you’re going to a famous blogger should you are
    not already. Cheers!

    Here is my homepage :: Pure CBD Softgels Reviews

  14. Terra Xtract CBD on 18/09/2021 at 1:29 pm

    Fabulous, what a website it is! This blog presents valuable information to us, keep it up.

    My web site: Terra Xtract CBD

  15. https://polywebhost.com/ on 18/09/2021 at 1:39 pm

    This excellent website definitely has all the information and facts I needed concerning this subject and didn’t know who to ask.

    Feel free to surf to my webpage: Keto X3 Review (https://polywebhost.com/)

  16. GrownMD CBD Gummies on 18/09/2021 at 1:41 pm

    As a Newbie, I am constantly searching online for articles that can aid me.
    Thank you

    My website … GrownMD CBD Gummies

  17. Extreme Muscle XXL Muscle Gainer on 18/09/2021 at 3:10 pm

    Oh my goodness! Incredible article dude! Thank you so much,
    However I am experiencing issues with your RSS. I don’t
    understand why I am unable to join it. Is there anybody else having the same RSS issues?
    Anybody who knows the answer will you kindly respond? Thanks!!

    my blog post: Extreme Muscle XXL Muscle Gainer

  18. www.mhes.tyc.edu.tw on 18/09/2021 at 3:37 pm

    Aw, this was a very good post. Spending some time and actual effort to produce a very
    good article? but what can I say? I hesitate a lot and never seem to get
    nearly anything done.

    My homepage :: Bioneo Farms CBD, http://www.mhes.tyc.edu.tw,

  19. Extreme Keto EFX Pills on 18/09/2021 at 4:47 pm

    Saved as a favorite, I really like your web site!

    My blog post – Extreme Keto EFX Pills

  20. Quick Keto Trim Review on 18/09/2021 at 6:50 pm

    Thank you a lot for sharing this with all of us you actually recognize what
    you are talking approximately! Bookmarked. Kindly additionally
    visit my site =). We will have a link change arrangement between us

    Feel free to visit my blog :: Quick Keto Trim Review

  21. Brittany on 20/09/2021 at 6:46 am

    I’m really inspired along with your writing skills as well as with the structure on your
    weblog. Is that this a paid subject or did you customize it yourself?
    Anyway stay up the nice quality writing, it’s rare to look a nice blog like this one
    nowadays..

  22. Ernesto on 20/09/2021 at 8:06 am

    Hello, I wish for to subscribe for this weblog to obtain most up-to-date updates, so where can i do it please assist.

  23. Emelia on 20/09/2021 at 10:09 am

    Appreciation to my father who told me concerning this weblog, this webpage
    is actually amazing.

  24. Horace on 20/09/2021 at 12:39 pm

    Howdy! This is kind of off topic but I need some advice from
    an established blog. Is it hard to set up your own blog?

    I’m not very techincal but I can figure things out pretty
    fast. I’m thinking about creating my own but I’m not sure
    where to start. Do you have any points or suggestions?
    Appreciate it

  25. Life Experience Degree on 25/09/2021 at 7:21 am

    Hi there, always i used to check blog posts here in the early hours in the
    break of day, as i enjoy to learn more and more.

Leave a Comment